• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Home
  • Privacy Policy
  • Help

Lake Holiday News

Everything you need to know about Lake Holiday ...

  • History
  • Videos
  • Sound Bites
  • Docs
  • Gallery
  • Silent Sitters
You are here: Home / Archives for Miller-&-Smith

Miller-&-Smith

All 3 Proposed Documents Were Rejected By Wide Margins

June 20, 2006 By LakeHolidayNews

Approval of the Chris Allison-crafted governing documents – the declaration, the articles of incorporation, and the bylaws – failed. It took the board until Monday, June 19th – 9 days after the election – to announce the results. The graph below summarizes what many suspected:

June 10, 2006 Voting Results

With respect to the vote on the Declaration, we deducted the reported 641 Miller & Smith “Trust” lots from the reported Yes votes for the Declaration to present a fairer picture.

In the end, more than the approval of documents failed. Chris Allison and the board failed to make a genuine effort to promote democracy by adopting voting standards different from recent Lake Holiday elections. Chris Allison and the board failed to listen to widespread discontent in the community, evidenced by the numerous “Vote No” signs on Redland Road and at all of the mail stops. They failed to sell the community on their documents, despite their free Miller & Smith hot dogs and other aggressive sales efforts that continued right through the meeting of members on June 10th.

[Read more…] about All 3 Proposed Documents Were Rejected By Wide Margins

Filed Under: Governing Docs, Lawsuit Tagged With: Allison, Miller-&-Smith

Questions Chris Allison Should Answer for Members

May 18, 2006 By LakeHolidayNews

1. Chris, why let Miller & Smith vote the Trust lots when the owner of these lots is not a member and is not paying dues?

FYI: This was not clearly disclosed to members, especially when one considers that Chris Allison and the Board expressed exactly the opposite position last spring. This seems to put the interest of a non-dues paying entity which is not even a member for those lots ahead of the interests of dues paying members whose interests the Board has a fiduciary responsibility to protect.

2. Chris, why is the 6/10/06 vote on the new declaration at large instead of section-by-section?

FYI: Section 6A has 259 lots, and none of them are owned by Miller & Smith. Chris Allison and the Board’s decision to vote on the declaration at large, instead of section-by-section, means that non-owners will be voting to amend another owner’s declaration. Combining at large voting with allowing Miller & Smith to vote over 700 non-dues paying lots means that voters in every section will be swamped! In Section 4B, there are only 16 lots. How will these lot owners have any chance of a fair election?

[Read more…] about Questions Chris Allison Should Answer for Members

Filed Under: Governing Docs, Lawsuit, Membership Lots Tagged With: Allison, Ingegneri, Masters, Miller-&-Smith

It’s a Different Tune, but the Same Old Song

May 14, 2006 By LakeHolidayNews

We’ve received a number of phone calls from members about the complete reversal of LHCC’s position on voting policies applicable to the upcoming vote on proposed governing documents. For the vote currently scheduled for 6/10/06, LHCC plans to:

  • vote for the new declaration at large, instead of section by section
  • allow M & S to vote lots for which it is not paying dues

Combining at large voting on the proposed declaration with allowing M & S to vote its over 700 non-dues paying lots, if allowed to take place, would determine the outcome of the election. For example, it would mean that the declaration for Section 6A with its 259 lots, a section where M & S owns no lots as of 4/30/06, could be amended even if every member in that section voted against the proposed declaration, because of the impact of M & S voting its over 700 lots. The impact on approval of the proposed Bylaws and Articles of Incorporation is even dramatic.

The directors and management of LHCC were adamant in public meetings in the spring of 2005 on 2 points: that any vote on the proposed declaration would be section by section, and that M & S would not be allowed to vote lots for which it is not paying dues, including voting its lots in an election on the new governing documents. This is a change of course if ever there was one.

[Read more…] about It’s a Different Tune, but the Same Old Song

Filed Under: Governing Docs, Lawsuit Tagged With: Miller-&-Smith, voting

We Rate the Docs Zero Stars!

May 11, 2006 By LakeHolidayNews

We’ve performed a careful review of the proposed governing documents, and there is one obvious conclusion: the documents as proposed are bad for just about every member, unless you are M & S or a future member of the Covenants Committee. There are 6 areas where the proposed documents hurt nearly every member:

  • Assessments
  • Easements
  • Amendment
  • Adding Land
  • Rights & Protections
  • Restrictions

Never forget that if your home or lot is a property at Lake Holiday, it is part of the Submitted Land and is covered by these governing documents.

[Read more…] about We Rate the Docs Zero Stars!

Filed Under: Governing Docs, Lawsuit Tagged With: Miller-&-Smith, voting

We’ve Got a Really Sweet Deal For You…

April 5, 2006 By LakeHolidayNews

Some of the most desirable lots in the entire Lake Holiday subdivision are the lots in Sections 1A and 7. For many years, the Association didn’t have enough money. Following the end of the building moratorium, there was pent-up demand for new construction at Lake Holiday. The real estate economy was booming. So what did some of the present and past directors of the Association decide to do? Would you have guessed they would have sold the most valuable lots at the lowest possible prices and thrown in a waiver of all fees and dues for 2 years – just to sweeten the deal? It made it so sweet it might make you sick.

[Read more…] about We’ve Got a Really Sweet Deal For You…

Filed Under: Finances, Lawsuit Tagged With: Ingegneri, Miller-&-Smith

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Page 2
  • Page 3

Primary Sidebar

Recent Comments

  • Leona Garland on What You Weren’t Told About the Utility Sale
  • Leona Garland on LHCC Dues Are Too High By As Much As 46%
  • scott on LHCC Dues Are Too High By As Much As 46%
  • Eric on Jill Holtzman Vogel Rushes To Help Out Big Developer
  • Puzzled on Jill Holtzman Vogel and SB 1489: The Sequel To A Flop

Categories

General

  • Lake Holiday
  • Wikipedia Entry on Lake Holiday

Government

  • Virginia CIC Liason
  • Virginia Law
  • Virginia SCC Div of Energy Reg
  • Virginia SCC Docket Search

Other Builders

  • Lake Holiday, LLC

Other Voices

  • SchoolMatters.com Frederick Cnty
  • Summit Advisor Current News
  • Summit Advisor Forum

Copyright © 2005–2025 · WordPress · Log in