The October 2006 election was a sham.
Comparing the October 2006 election results to the 2 most recent elections in Lake Holiday history arouses suspicions.
In June 2006, the entire community was focused on major overhauls to governing documents. voting interest was at a record high. The June 2006 election results show that 760 or more eligible members voted on the proposed Bylaws and the proposed Articles of Incorporation. But for the October 2006 election of directors, over 800 eligible members voted in an event that most would describe as not attracting a lot of interest. In fact, the number of in-person votes cast at the October 2006 election actually declined from October 2005. This year's election attracted only 7 announced candidates, compared to the 17 running for office in 2005. How did participation in an election of directors that by every measure captured little attention exceed interest in a total re-write of the rules governing the Association?
Consider the candidates running for the Board. Dave buermeyer and Noel O'Brien were candidates in the October 2005 election. In October 2005, Buermeyer captured 158 votes and failed to win a board seat. O'Brien received 167 votes and was declared a winner. But in October 2006, just 1 year later, Buermeyer was credited with 527 votes and O'Brien with 497. Is it believable that the popularity of these candidates more than tripled, despite the fact that they've been nearly silent and invisible on the Board?
So what produced the reported voter turnout?
Voting of the Trust lots at Lake Holiday needs to be understood in the context of 2 documents: the 1984 Settlement Agreement and the Declaration of Covenants
Paragraph 2 of the 1984 Settlement Agreement between LHCC and Independence Land states:
It is further agreed that Independence Land shall not be a member of Club nor shall it have any vote on the affairs of the Club by reason of its ownership of Independence Land Property.
it is not even a member of the Associationdoes not have the option to elect to pay dues and establish membership, and therefore acquire the opportunity to vote. The phrase “shall not be a member” is equivalent to “must not be a member.”
Declaration of Covenants contains a definition of the term “Developer”:
any entity purchasing two (2) or more lots for development in the Independence Land Property in any single transaction or related series of transactions.
However, in the October 2006 election, 2 Developers, SK Homes and Eagle Crest, cast votes for their Section 10 lots which were improperly accepted as eligible.
Allowing non-members to vote in the October 2006 election impacted the makeup of the Board. Fair play says this needs to be fixed right away.
Our characterization that membership – and therefore possible voting eligibility – begins after a home is constructed and purchased is exactly what was presented to members at a Development Q & A Session
Q: Question is this: when will each M/S/O lot start paying these assessments? When a house is started or upon the sale of the house or lot to a private individual?
A: Upon the sale of the lot to individuals. Developer will build houses and memberships will begin when the lot is closed on and the owner becomes a member of LHCC.
This is the same answer given by then (and current) director Pat Shields in Question 9:
Q: Will each home sold in the trust development then become members of LHCC and paying annual assessments? Will each sold in the trust development then pay water and sewer fees to LHEUC?
A: Absolutely. At the time the house transfers from the developer to the property owner, they will begin paying dues and water usage fees.
Does current Director Pat Shields not recall his own explanation?
has no ability to make this election
Do the current directors of LHCC have the spine to stand up to Chris Allison and address election fraud? Will they support fair play or will they remain silent and support fixing elections?
How informative did you find this post (1=lowest, 10=highest) ?
Loading...
Leave a Reply