• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Home
  • Privacy Policy
  • Help

Lake Holiday News

Everything you need to know about Lake Holiday ...

  • History
  • Videos
  • Sound Bites
  • Docs
  • Gallery
  • Silent Sitters
You are here: Home / 10/06 Election / Who Shares Chris Allison’s Guilt?

Who Shares Chris Allison’s Guilt?

November 24, 2006 By LakeHolidayNews

In previous posts, we’ve documented the fact that Chris Allison allowed Miller & Smith and its builders to vote non-member Trust lots in the October 2006 election of directors. Apparently, he made this decision without Board approval because he boasts in an email to a fellow director that this “was and is not a Board issue.”

If permitted to stand, Chris Allison’s action allowing Miller & Smith and its builders to vote non-member Trust lots empowers Miller & Smith to dominate every election at Lake Holiday for the foreseeable future – including votes on new governing documents. Chris Allison’s action completely undercuts the democratic process because it gives a vote to non-members. Chris Allison’s action goes against every precedent and election at Lake Holiday since 1984 – including the most recent election in June of 2006 – because the Trust lots have not been voted in past elections. Chris Allison fundamentally breached his fiduciary duty as set forth in LHCC’s Articles of Incorporation to promote the “welfare of the members” because allowing non-members to vote and dominate elections is fundamentally counter to serving the welfare of those members.

Chris Allison’s culpability is crystal clear. But what about the rest of the Board?

Does the Board Share Allison's Guilt?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Chris Allison did all of this without Board approval, and he has bragged about this to a fellow director. He overstepped every reasonable bound. We think the time has long since passed for the Board to remove Chris Allison. A number of members have questioned individual Board members about Chris Allison’s behavior in the October 2006 election and asked them to address it. But to date, the Board has done nothing and
refused to address this problem. Apparently, individual Board members continue to accept Chris Allison’s tortured explanations and do not obtain independent counsel on the appropriateness of his out-of-control behavior. However, they can not plead ignorance, and they can not disavow responsibility. We think the Board’s failure to act in the face of this clearly documented election manipulation causes them to share Chris Allison’s guilt. Do you agree?

What is your opinion on this important question?

PS – Miller & Smith can’t vote the Trust lots in this vote.

How informative did you find this post (1=lowest, 10=highest) ? Terrible2 Stars3 Stars4 StarsAverage6 Stars7 Stars8 Stars9 StarsTerrific!
Loading...

Filed Under: 10/06 Election, Lawsuit Tagged With: Allison, Miller-&-Smith, voting

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Connie Olson says

    November 24, 2006 at 1:50 pm

    Thanks for this information. Is there any legal action being taken to challenge the election results and the eligibility of non-members votes?

Primary Sidebar

Recent Comments

  • Leona Garland on What You Weren’t Told About the Utility Sale
  • Leona Garland on LHCC Dues Are Too High By As Much As 46%
  • scott on LHCC Dues Are Too High By As Much As 46%
  • Eric on Jill Holtzman Vogel Rushes To Help Out Big Developer
  • Puzzled on Jill Holtzman Vogel and SB 1489: The Sequel To A Flop

Categories

General

  • Lake Holiday
  • Wikipedia Entry on Lake Holiday

Government

  • Virginia CIC Liason
  • Virginia Law
  • Virginia SCC Div of Energy Reg
  • Virginia SCC Docket Search

Other Builders

  • Lake Holiday, LLC

Other Voices

  • SchoolMatters.com Frederick Cnty
  • Summit Advisor Current News
  • Summit Advisor Forum

Copyright © 2005–2025 · WordPress · Log in